The Dawes Arboretum regularly evaluates our research partnerships to align with our nonprofit mission, stewardship standards and research priorities. After careful review, we determined that one of our apple tree research plots at Red Barn Reserve was no longer being responsibly maintained by the researcher and was a threat to other valuable plant collections. There is an abundance of invasive species including poison hemlock, honeysuckle and wild parsnip in the plot that is harming the nearby Dawn Redwoods (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) Plant Collection Network (PCN).
Fortunately, there is another apple tree plot that Dawes maintains with genetic stock from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. These trees are accessioned and data is stored in the plant records assuring valuable genetics are archived: https://dawesarb.arboretumexplorer.org/taxon-24641.aspx.
The Arboretum averages 20-30 active research partnerships at any given time working with universities, conservation organizations and independent researchers.
As a part of strengthening institutional practices to ensure fairness, transparency and consistency for all researchers working with us, The Arboretum must have formal agreements in place to ensure performance expectations, deliverables, maintenance and management for both parties. The lack of this type of agreement is what led to ambiguity at the apple plot in question. Dawes has been a generous host since 2004, allowing this research to be done on the land for free. The original research has concluded and the research plot has not been tended for many years. The neglect has allowed harmful invasives to proliferate in this area and the Red Barn Reserve. These species are a direct harm to humans and the plot needs restoration.
We concluded the partnership thoughtfully and respectfully, giving the researcher a 15-month window to access the plot and collect scion wood, which continues until March 2027.
Concluding this agreement allows Dawes to steward this land, protect other nearby research plots and explore future conservation or educational uses for this site.
Frequently Asked Questions:
Was the researcher contacted before a decision was made?
We communicated the decision clearly and respectfully and have provided an appropriate transition period that allows the researcher to preserve elements of their work moving forward.
Why not negotiate the agreement instead of ending it?
After reviewing our current research priorities, we determined this research area is no longer a focus for the organization. Dawes is not focused on crop research at this time. However, we are involved in studying pawpaws and continuing our historical connection to maple syrup.
What will happen to the trees?
Once the researcher has removed the material, the plot will be cleared of invasive plants which are actively threatening other research plots. The remaining trees will be provided for browsing as part of ongoing partnerships with local zoos.
Was this decision financially motivated?
No. This was not a financially motivated decision. It was guided by our nonprofit mission and organization's priorities. We have never received any compensation for this project.
This decision allows Dawes to move forward in a way that honors our nonprofit mission, supports innovative research and ensures responsible stewardship for the future.